Industry body COAI on Saturday returned fire in the ongoing stand-off with Reliance Jio, saying its “differences” are with regulator Trai’s orders, not with a specific operator, and that it is duty-bound as an association to raise concerns on growth of the sector.
The rebuttal comes after Reliance Jio termed as “defamatory” and “malicious” recent allegations by the Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) that indicated that orders by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) are favouring the newcomer.
“Our differences are with the orders of the regulator and not with any specific operator. Our intention is not to aggrieve any particular operator. Individual operators are free to pursue the interests of their own company vigorously under the framework of the laws of the land,” COAI director general Rajan S Mathews said in a statement, reported Business Standard.
COAI’s statement on Saturday further said, “However, the regulator’s role is to ensure the competing claims of companies are appropriately handled in the interest of the entire industry. This is the mandate of the TRAI Act, which specifically tasks it with ensuring the orderly growth of the industry.” COAI emphasized that as an industry body it raises concerns over various issues. “…we raise our concerns, as any relevant Industry association should, for the growth and development of the sector and in the interest of the nation,” COAI said.
The association argued that all its “other” member operators are unanimous in their support of COAI’s position “with absolutely no exceptions”.
Jio—which is also a COAI member—had on Friday claimed it was kept in the dark about the release issued by the trade body. Billionaire Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Jio had also launched a scathing attack on COAI, saying the body has become a mouthpiece of incumbents like Airtel and is issuing “defamatory” and “malicious” statements on Trai favouring it.
The full-blown war of words has erupted in the sector after COAI alleged that Trai’s regulations, including its rules and definition of predatory pricing, had distorted the market.COAI had also alleged that the orders appeared “to be strengthening the ambitions of one particular operator with deep pockets and monopolistic designs at the expense of other operators” although it did not name Reliance Jio which has hit the incumbent operators hard by its aggressive pricing of mobile and data services, stated BS.
